top of page

How to Obtain a Certificate of Appealability

After a person is convicted or entered a plea, an appeal is normally a matter of right. This same right does not exist at all stages of the proceedings.

Certificate of Appealability, Federal Appeals Court, Post-conviction relief, Incarceration, Reduction of Sentence, Alabama Court of Appeals, Minnesota Court of Appeals

Where a federal district court denies a 2254 habeas corpus petition filed a by a state prisoner or a 2255 petition to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence by a federal prisoner, the litigant must first obtain a certificate of appealability, commonly referred to as a “COA,” before the appellate court will hear the appeal. [1]

To obtain a COA, the petitioner must make “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” [2] If the district court denied the claim on procedural grounds, the petitioner must convince the court “at least, that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.” [3] Similarly, when the district court rejects a claim on the merits, the petitioner must show that “that reasonable jurists would find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong.” [4] This standard does not mean that the petitioner must show that a reasonable judge would grant the habeas corpus petition. [5] The Supreme Court has even noted that a claim can be debatable for purposes of granting a COA where every reasonable judge might agree that the petitioner could not prevail after the COA was granted and the case had been given full consideration. [6]

After a COA is granted, the appeals court will set the issues for briefing. However, the appeal will be limited to the issues specified in the COA. [7] Appellate courts have discretion to expand an appeal beyond the issues raised in the COA, but that discretion is generally guarded and reserved for exceptional cases. [8]

If you or someone you love needs competent, experienced representation in seeking a certificate of appealability, contact Peter Armstrong, Attorney at Law, for a free consultation.

Citations:
1. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1); Anderson v. Sec’y for the Dep’t of Corr., 462 F.3d 1319, 1323 (11th Cir. 2006).
2. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
3. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
4. Id.
5. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 338 (2003).
6. Id.
7. U.S. v. Morgan, 230 F.3d 1067, 1069 (8th Cir. 2000); Hodges v. AG, 506 F.3d 1337, 1340-41 (11th Cir. 2007).
8. Winfield v. Roper, 460 F.3d 1026, 1040 (8th Cir. 2006); Mays v. U.S., 817 F.3d 728, 733 (11th Cir. 2016).

Peter Armstrong Law, Logo, Peter Felix Armstrong, Alabama, Minnesota

Peter Felix Armstrong
Attorney at Law

Phone: 334-893-0039

Email: peter@peterarmstronglaw.com

Send us your email address to set up a free consultation.

“No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be  performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.” Ala. R. Prof. Conduct 7.2(e).

bottom of page